Q&A: Two pH Sensors – what is causing this difference?
January 2019 Newsletter
The data shown above originate from two different pH sensors deployed in the same well-mixed test bath. Both sensors were cleaned, tested, and calibrated before deployment, and were given 24 hours to equilibrate before recording data. So why does each sensor appear to be offset from the other, and why does the sensor shown in green appear to have gaps in data?
Find the Answer
These results highlight two noteworthy differences between each sensor technology:
- Initial Accuracy: the SeapHOx V2 has an initial accuracy of ±0.05 pH or better, while most glass electrode pH sensors (the HydroCAT-EP included) have an initial accuracy of ±0.1 pH. The figure above demonstrates each sensor’s accuracy with the shaded area around each line (light green = HC-pH accuracy, light red = SeapHOx V2 accuracy, yellow= overlap). Based on the validation samples, both pH sensors were reporting data within their accuracy specifications, but the SeapHOx V2 was clearly more accurate from start to finish.
- Sampling resolution: the “stepwise” changes in the HC-pH data are the result of lower resolution. The sensor is unable to resolve changes lower than 0.01 pH, so small changes in pH aren’t recorded until a large enough change can be detected. The SeapHOx V2 is able to resolve small changes of up to 0.004 pH, resulting in smooth lines as pH drops.
While the data from the ISFET pH sensor are superior in accuracy, resolution, and stability, there are still many applications where glass electrode sensors such as the one integrated with the HydroCAT-EP are sufficient. However, when you need top of the line pH for long-term moored deployments, an instrument using an ISFET pH sensor (SeaFET V2, SeapHOx V2, or Deep SeapHOx V2) is necessary.
Related Posts
Featured Posts
2024 MTS Buoy Workshop
We are excited to exhibit at the upcoming MTS Buoy Workshop this year from May 20 - 23. Please come visit us in our backyard at table #1 to chat with our team to learn more about the latest at Sea-Bird Scientific and oceanography. We'll have associates from...
Case Study: Understanding the Implications of the Lahaina Wildfire on Coastal Water Quality with the HydroCAT-EP V2
Contributors: Dr. Andrea Kealoha (she/her)¹, Natalie Zielinski (she/her)², Marialena Christopoulou (she/her)² Authors: Lindsey Biondo (she/her)², Natalie Zielinski (she/her)² ¹ University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Department of Oceanography, 1000 Pope Road, Honolulu, HI...
Webinar on Fathom Software in Partnership with the Marine Technology Society
We were excited to partner with the Marine Technology Society (MTS https://www.mtsociety.org/) to bring you a webinar to walk through our new software. We’re excited to release Fathom – the latest in software innovation at Sea-Bird Scientific (SBS). Heather Eberhart,...